BlogVibe

Conclusion

If a workstation class board is necessary, chances are the user scenario is pushing the board for extended periods of time with large memory, GPU, or storage requirements. Along with a generally more robust nature, some workstation class boards offer users such as IPMI BMC support for remote monitoring (this one doesn't, to be clear) as well as additional options such as U.2 ports and other storage support. How many people really need a workstation class board is another thing altogether, however utilizing these boards in an IT environment can help with monitoring and tracking problem areas for an Operations team. Regardless, many organizations choose to go with workstation motherboards, but is this for you? 

The appearance of the SuperMicro X11SRA is almost a throwback to the days before RGB LEDs. The only ones we find on the board are notification and dummy lights and not able to be controlled nor intended to improve the aesthetic. That said, the board's black PCB is busy with all the printing on board. The power delivery heatsink looks a bit anemic but held its own during testing without issue. All DRAM and PCIe slots are reinforced as well. 

I really do not have too much to complain about, outside of the incredibly long boot times. But again, this is a workstation class board that goes through additional checks upon post before handing it off to the attached storage. Other than that, I didn't find anything to improve. 

Performance on the Supermicro X11SRA was mixed in quite nicely with the other X299 results we had. It didn't lead any benchmarking categories, nor was it last, but made its home in the middle of our results. The board doesn't appear to add any MCE features we have seen on the consumer HEDT platform. To that end, where it did very well was in the power consumption tests. On idle, the X11SRA and Xeon W-2155 combination used the least power by several watts. In our load testing, it was in 3rd place (of 16). We saw this result due to in part to the lack of MCE. Where the X11SRA differs a lot from our consumer testing is the minimal 'extra' software and BIOS options for gaming features - instead the software focuses on monitoring the system. We would have liked to see some fan adjustment and bidirectional control, as this is something all motherboards should be able to do. 

Overall the Supermicro X11SRA proved to be a good performing motherboard in our test bench and especially in power consumption. At $340 however, it is a pricey solution when compared to some of the X299 motherboards which come in a bit cheaper (as well as some eclipsing this amount). The only other option on the market is really ASUS' C422 PRO/SE, or perhaps GIGABYTE's MW51-HP0.

Truth be told, I have had this board for weeks and have been hammering it with near constant testing in order to add to our Bench database. It handled anything from a 4C/4T CPU all the way up to the monster 18-core Xeon W-2195 processor without an issue. If you are looking for a workstation class board versus a consumer board, the Supermicro X11SRA will provide a solid foundation with which to build a workstation from. 

Other AnandTech X299 Motherboard Reviews:

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7orrAp5utnZOde6S7zGiKoaenZJavsMSxZmpqZWp9gK%2Bvmp6edWRbrq24nH%2BYpauVW8CwvtN2Z1%2BokZyyfn2PX6qlrZdywamxjKysqZ2iorakvs5mr2ppo6eubrnOrZ%2BeqpKkrrOwjKucr6GVrHqkgJFrZJuZo5qxbsPOq6KsrJGptrC6jLGcqKanYravv8idnGY%3D